Fact check on “2000 Mules,” the movie alleging voter fraud – The Denver Post

A movie that debuted in more than 270 theaters in the United States this week uses flawed analysis of cell phone location data and surveillance footage of polls to cast doubt on the results of the 2020 presidential election nearly 18 months after completion.

Praised by former President Donald Trump for exposing the “great voter fraud,” the film, called “2000 Mules,” paints an ominous picture suggesting that Democrat-aligned ballot “mules” were allegedly paid to illegally collect and deliver ballots. in Arizona, Ga. Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

But that’s based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and inadequate analysis of cellphone location data, which isn’t accurate enough to confirm someone dropped a ballot in a drop box, experts say.

The film was produced by conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza and uses research from the Texas-based nonprofit True the Vote, which has spent months lobbying states to use its findings to change election laws. . Neither responded to a request for comment.

Here’s a closer look at the facts.

CLAIM: At least 2,000 “mules” were paid to illegally collect ballots and deliver them to drop boxes in key states ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

THE FACTS: It is true that the Vote did not prove this. The finding is based on false assumptions about the accuracy of cell phone tracking data and the reasons someone might drop off multiple ballots, according to experts.

“Ballot collection” is a pejorative term for leaving completed ballots for people other than yourself. The practice is legal in several states, but largely illegal in the states True the Vote focused on, with a few exceptions for family, household members, and people with disabilities.

True the Vote has said it found some 2,000 ballot collectors by purchasing $2 million worth of anonymous cell phone geolocation data, the “pings” that track a person’s location based on app activity, in various swing counties in five states. Then, by drawing a virtual boundary around the polls of one county and several unidentified nonprofits, he identified cellphones repeatedly approached both ahead of the 2020 election.

If a cell phone was near a mailbox more than 10 times and a nonprofit organization more than five times from October 1 through Election Day, True the Vote assumed its owner was a “mule,” its name for someone involved in an illegal ballot harvesting scheme. in collusion with a non-profit organization.

The group’s claims of a paid ticket collection scheme are backed up in the film only by an unnamed whistleblower said to be from St. Louis, Arizona, who said she saw people collecting what she “assumed” were payments. for collecting tickets. The film contains no evidence of such payments in other states in 2020.

Leave a Comment